Guidelines before Hiring a New Employee to Shield from Trade Secret Misappropriation

February 23rd, 2012

The following guidelines may assist a hiring employer to avoid legal risk involving trade secret misappropriation of new hires:

  1. Don’t rely solely on the previous position of the employee: This is risky for a hiring employer if all it does is consider only those employees who have previously worked in the same position.  Switching between companies, but working in the same position, is likely the situation where trade secret lawsuit invokes.  Familiarization of duties and roles could be one of the criterions but it should not be the only one.
  2. Be careful during interview: During the interview process, if a potential employee starts revealing confidential information of her previous employer, an interviewee must warn her and refuse to hear about the subject in further detail.  Incidental uses of trade secret owned by other companies can make a hiring employer liable under trade secret misappropriation.
  3. Investigate the application: As discussed in (1), the previous position held by an employee may inevitably lead to disclosure of a trade secret in a new position.  A hiring employee therefore must look into the roles and duties that the employee has been working.  If there are overlaps of current and previous duties, there are at least 2 ways to fix this: (a) a hiring employer might limit the responsibility of a new employee so that it does not involve the same duty as that of the previous company; and (2) a hiring employer might restructure the roles and duties of a new position in order to avoid potential trade secret lawsuits.
  4. Request the previous record of the employee: In order to safeguard against the future liability over trade secret misappropriation, a hiring employer should request any records that it thinks necessary regarding an employee’s previous employment.  For example, a hiring employer might request a former employment contract with a previous employer.  A hiring employer then analyzes and makes sure that there is no hidden term that restricts the employee’s future employment.  This is critically much more important when an employee’s previous employment contract contains a non-compete clause.  In this case, a hiring employee must make sure that if he hires this employee, he does not violate this clause.  There are 2 ways to avoid such violation: (1) a hiring employee may claim that this clause is invalid or unreasonable, and therefore unenforceable; or (2) the new employment does not relate to the previous employment.  However, such action will probably lead to future lawsuit that a hiring employer must keep in mind.

An expert trade secret attorney is able to analyze and investigate the previous employment contract and ensure that a hiring employer does not misappropriate any trade secret because of hiring its new personnel.

 

Comments

© 2011 Traverse Legal, PLC. All Rights Reserved.
Traverse Legal on LinkedInTraverse Legal on FacebookTraverse Legal on Twitter
Events & Conferences:
  • International Trademark Association 2011, San Francisco, California
  • Cyber Law Summit 2011, Las Vegas, Nevada
  • Game Developers Conference 2011, San Francisco, California
  • DOMAINfest 2011, Santa Monica, California
Recent Attorney Speaking Engagements:
  • South By Southwest 2010 SXSW Interactive Conference, Austin, Texas
  • West LegalEdcenter Midwestern Law Firm Management, Chicago, Illinois
  • Internet Advertising under Part 255, Altitude Design Summit, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Online Defamation and Reputation Management, News Talk 650 AM, The Cory Kolt Show, Canada Public Radio Saskatewan Canada
  • Alternative Fee Structures, Center for Competitive Management, Jersey City, New Jersey
  • FTC Part 255 Advertising Requirements, Mom 2.0 Conference, Houston, Texas
  • Webmaster Radio, Cybersquatting & Domain Monetization, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Notable Complex Litigation Cases Handled By Our Lawyers:
  • Trademark Infringement, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • Cybersquatting Law, Trademark Law and Dilution Detroit, Michigan
  • Internet Defamation & Online Libel Indianapolis, Indiana
  • Trade Secret Theft, Chicago, Illinois
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Miami, Florida
  • Cybersquatting Law, Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act Eastern Dist. of Virginia, Alexandria
  • Stolen Domain Name, Orlando, Florida
  • Commercial Litigation, Tampa, Florida
  • Copyright Infringement and Cybersquatting Law, Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • Mass Tort Litigation, Los Angeles, California
  • Stolen Domain Name, Detroit, Michigan
  • Adwords Keyword Trademark Infringement, Los Angeles, California
  • Trademark Infringement & Unfair Competition, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Non-Compete Agreement and Trade Secret Theft, Detroit, Michigan
  • Mass Tort, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Mass Tort, Tyler, Texas
  • Insurance Indemnity, New York
  • Copyright Infringement, Detroit, Michigan